One of the instructional themes in Teaching the Story is that the details which an author includes make a difference in depicting a character, setting, or time period. I am repeatedly reminded of this fact in my own reading and writing.
Currently I am listening to Chains by Laurie Halse Anderson. This story of a young black female slave in New York City during the American Revolution is full of well-researched details. The foods the characters eat (eel pie, strawberry tarts, turtle soup); the clothes which the slaves wore (rags for gloves in the middle of winter); the fashion of the upper class women (mouse fur for fake eyebrows); the foods which the prisoners shared (buckets of moldy table scraps which friends or family brought)—all of these provide authenticity to Anderson’s thought-provoking story about the struggle for freedom. (By the way, this book would be a great supplement for upper elementary through high school students who are studying this time period. Make sure you download the reading guide and Anderson’s “Behind The Book” also.)
Recently I wrote a scene in my historical novel where my character puts her dog on a leash and walks him. Several days later, I interviewed George Snyder, a native Charlottean who lived in Myers Park in 1950—-the place and time period for my book. While showing me the house he grew up in and talking about his childhood George said, "We all had dogs. They weren't penned like they are nowadays. They would just run after us on our bikes. No one had leashes." I wouldn’t have guessed that in 1950 in Charlotte, NC dogs weren't on leashes. A minor detail, but one that is now correct.
Here is a picture of George pointing out the initials “LS” (for Luther Snyder) carved in the shutters of his grandfather’s eighty-year-old house. It’s an intriguing detail which would be tempting to work into my story. But as Karen Dionne warns in “Fact into Fiction” in the January 2010 issue of Writer’s Digest, “Facts are fun, but if a detail doesn’t move the story forward by establishing the setting, advancing the plot or shedding light on the characters, it doesn’t belong.”
In a few years when you read Half-Truths and you come across a savory detail—be sure that I have thought long and hard about including it. And if initials appear in a shutter somewhere you'll know there is a reason why.
Technorati Tags:
Teaching the Story: Fiction Writing in Grades 4-8, Laurie Halse Anderson, Chains, historical fiction, Charlotte, 1950, details
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
THE NIGHT WAR: A MG Historical Novel Review
By now you should have received an email from my new website about my review of THE NIGHT WAR by Kimberly Brubaker Bradley. (It'll com...
-
Congratulations to Janet Davis-Castro who won HER FEARLESS RUN on last week's blog. No giveaway this week, but I hope you...
-
Although I normally feature middle grade or young adult books and authors, every once in awhile I find another author whose work I want t...
7 comments:
Yeah, this is always the hardest part - leaving out fascinating facts. And not letting history overpower the story.
Big temptation for me!
Great post!
I LOVE details. And it's gut-wrenching to leave some of them out, isn't it?
Thanks for the reminder, Carol.
And Merry Christmas!
Jean
Thanks Jean and Joyce for your comments. Many, many wonderful details will get left out...but I must gather them first before figuring out what to leave out!
I just re-read your quotes. Terrific truths! I'm printing these babies out.
Thanks,
Jean
Jean, How cool is it that you and I were reading each others blogs at the same time? Glad you liked that blog. It's time for another. Stay tuned.
This sounds like a fabulous book! I look forward to reading it, my friend! :)
Happy New Year...and Happy writing!
hugs,
Donna E.
http://www.donnaearnhardt.com
Thanks, Donna. Now if I could only find the time to figure out which details go in and which get left out! Happy New Year to you and make the Lord bless your work and your family.
Post a Comment